Fact Sheets on the Best Digital Cameras
 
 
 
 
    Bookmark and Share  
Photoxels Gift Guide 2007
 
Home
News
Articles (RSS Feed)
Press Releases
Site Map
 
Best Digital Cameras
Buyer's Guide
Point-and-Shoot
Beginner
Serious
Advanced
Ultra Compact
Ultra Zoom
User Manuals
 
Digital Camera Reviews
Reviews Matrix
Photoxels Awards
 
Fundamentals
Tutorials
Glossary
 
History of Cameras
Featured Sites
Contests
Links
 
About Us
Contact
Privacy Statement
 
Photo Store
Digital Cameras
Accessories
Photography Books
Posters
Sponsors
Shopbot.ca -- Comparison Shopping


-- US --
In Association with Amazon.com

Search Now:

-- Canada --

-- UK --
In Association with Amazon.co.uk

 

 


Partners
DIWA Awards

 
PMA
Mobile Phone
Digital Camera
 
 
You are hereHome > Editorial > Jan 2003

Editorial - Jan 2003

Happy New Year 2003!

We hope you all had a restful and safe holidays.

In this editorial, we want to talk a bit about the "state of the union" as far as digital cameras are concerned. Just where are we in the technical evolution of digital cameras? Somewhere in the 35mm equivalent of the 1980's!

Back in the 1980's, 35mm cameras were making great stride, but it was still a challenge for a beginner to take perfectly exposed, correctly focused pictures. We find ourselves at the same point in the history of digital cameras -- except that the rate of technological advancement is progressing at a much accelerated pace.

So, let's have some fun and try to predict what the Year 2003 will bring us as far as digital cameras are concerned.

Low-Light Focus-Assist
This neat feature fires a burst of infrared light (or green/blue light depending on the type of AF used) at your subject to allow autofocus in dim situations. Without it, it is almost impossible for the camera's AF to gain a positive lock, and blurred pictures usually result. We are increasingly seeing this feature in low end digital cameras, so expect to see all digital cameras worth your consideration sport this feature. It doesn't have it, you say? Well, we say, forget it and go for one that does!

Higher ISOs
The most common complaints we hear from beginners are that their indoor shots are blurred. The reason is, of course, that without adequate lighting, the camera will open up the aperture to its maximum opening (thus decreasing depth-of-field) and use a slow shutter speed (thus increasing the chance of blurred shot due to: 1) camera shake and 2) not using a shutter speed fast enough to stop action).

By using a higher ISO, e.g. ISO 400, indoors, the camera can select a smaller aperture and/or faster shutter speed. The problem the current crop of digital cameras face is that at higher ISOs, noise becomes a problem: the colored pixels that make up the digital picture becomes painfully visible to the naked eye. Digital cameras therefore use various noise reduction techniques to deal with this problem, but, as can be expected, the best ones are found in the higher-end DSLR professional digital cameras. Expect to see better noise reduction in compact digital cameras, and hence the availability of higher ISOs.

Noise Reduction
As mentioned above, we can expect to see better noise reduction in compact digital cameras. This is important not just when using higher ISOs, but noise is also a problem when using slow shutter speeds, e.g. 1/30 sec. and slower.

You might have situations when you want to use a slow shutter speed while still using a low ISO, e.g. when taking landscape scenes where you stop down the aperture for maximum depth-of-field and the camera compensates with a slow shutter speed for proper exposure. If you're into night photography, then slow shutter speeds are de rigueur. So, better noise reduction is a desirable feature that you can expect to see available in the better compact digital cameras.

Shutter Lag
The dreaded shutter lag has frustrated many a digital camera user to tears. It might take a good 2 full seconds from the moment you press the sutter release button to the actual recording of the picture by the camera. Of course, meanwhile, little Susie has already wandered off the screen, and the basketball is on the rebound.

When you write in to forums to complain, you get chastised for not being smart enough to anticipate the action and pre-focus by slightly depressing the shutter release half-way. It's your stinking fault that most digital cameras have unacceptable shutter lags.

Read the last part of the above sentence again: I said, "most digital cameras have unacceptable shutter lags."

You were right to complain about the long shutter lags, and camera manufacturers will listen and improve -- or, ignore their models and favor those who do reduce the shutter lags of their digital cameras. Expect shutter lag to become a problem of the past.

Better Lenses
Camera manufacturers are starting to come out with lenses specially made for digital cameras. Olympus with its 4/3 System, and Nikon with its DX Nikkor System. Other camera manufacturers will follow.

Also, we have witnessed interesting alliances between traditional electronics company and traditional optics manufacturers, such as Sony and Carl Zeiss, and Panasonic and Leica. We wonder, though, if Carl Zeiss and Leica are doing anything to port their lenses to the specialized needs of the digital cameras. It is not a trivial pursuit.

We believe that Olympus and Nikon will come out with lens systems better suited to digital cameras. Nikon's wide-angle DX Nikkor is an encouraging beginning.

Other improvements are long zoom lenses (optical zoom of 8x and higher) with built-in image stabilization. Price has been an issue, but the demand is so strong that we cannot believe that someone will not take advantage of this demand and sell a lot of digital cameras. This one feature would sway many customers one way or another. Put image stabilization back into the Olympus C730 Ultra-Zoom and see if it does not start selling like hot cake!

Well, this has been the Photoxels editors weighing in with their predictions for the Year 2003. Tell us what you think is coming or would like to see in new digital cameras.

We Still Love Sony
Last year, we poked some good-natured fun at Sony concerning its to-be-soon-announced MemoryStick Pro, rumored in an article by CNET to be incompatible with its current line of digital cameras.

Sony chose not to honor this rumor by an official denial in the press, choosing instead to send an "official statement" to dpreview.com. However, by not rebuting the allegations in the wider public press, Sony showed poor judgment toward its fans (among which we number) and potential customers.

In some forums, a few owners of Sony digital cameras took offense at those of us who were upset with Sony and castigated us as 'Sony bashers.' Nothing could be further from the truth.

Sony is one of the most, if not the most, innovative company in the world. This is the company which has brought us the Walkman -- the personal cassette player that started a revolution in miniaturization in everything electronics. Sony digital cameras are among the best -- and yes, our Editors voted the Sony F717 Editor's Choice in the Advanced Amateur category.

To those Sony owners who think that a constructive criticism makes one a Sony basher, grow up! We understand that you are quite happy with the 128MB MemoryStick and couldn't care less if the MemoryStick Pro is compatible or not. Well, we do! We respect your opinions, respect ours. We sincerely hope that the F717 (and other current Sony digital cameras) will be able to take the new larger-sized MemoryStick Pro. Bet you'd be among the very first to buy them if they are compatible .

In fact, there were quiet sighs of relief in some forums when it was discovered that some non-English Sony F717 User's Manuals made mention of a 1GB MemoryStick Pro. True or not, Sony -- and its fans -- have to face the music since the current MemoryStick just can't hack it anymore. Anyway, the combined voices of all Sony customers in well-respected forums do influence the decision-makers at Sony. Sony is just too smart to not listen to its customers, so expect Sony to send some kind of 'peace signals.' Sony knows we are clamoring for a larger-sized MemoryStick -- that's why they are introducing the MemoryStick Pro.

Will Sony sell less digital cameras because of this poor handling of an issue that is important to many of us? Probably not. Sony digital cameras will continue to be a popular choice among many, and we predict that the new and larger-sized MemoryStick Pro will finally remove what amounted to be a stumbling block for many. So Sony can even expect to increase its market share of digital cameras in the Year 2003. It will have to work harder at it, though, because even a 1GB MemoryStick Pro is just playing catch up -- Samsung, the increasingly visible South Korean electronics (among other things) company, quietly announced earlier in September the first 2-gigabit Flash memory devices which, when mounted on a single memory card, yields a 4GB CompactFlash card. We are just not used not seeing Sony at the head of the parade. 'Nuff said.

This January Issue
In this issue, we have added a new section to our Tutorial on why it is so difficult to take good Low-Light Indoors Pictures with the current crop of compact digital cameras. We also explain how by using exposure bracketing you can ensure properly exposed pictures.

As far as housekeeping is concerned, we have removed some cameras no longer in production, added Minolta cameras to our list, added a couple of links, and added a number of forms: with our new Feedback form, you can now tell us what you think of a particular article; with our Bookmark and Share form, you can help a beginner learn more about digital cameras; our form is used to give a hint about the kind of gift you would really love to have; and you can contact us with our Contact Us form.

We hope you enjoy this New Year issue!

The Editors

 
B&H Photo - Video - Pro Audio

 

 

 

 

Get Chitika eMiniMalls


  Home | Best Digital Cameras | Digital Camera Reviews | Tutorials | Special | About | Shop  
 

Product technical specifications are as represented by the manufacturer
and subject to manufacturer's change, so please do not rely on them without verification.
All trademarks, service marks, and Copyrights are the property of their respective owners.
Privacy Notice. Copyright © 2002-2009 Photoxels. All rights reserved.
Site Design by mauripress.