Amazon.com Widgets
Make The Difference Network
 a

Saturday, September 26th, 2009
| More
Fun Stuff
+

Photoshop Disasters & Other Fun Stuff

You see it everyday on the magazine covers, and it’s lots of fun…

Visit PsD

Also fun:
- World’s Most Famous Photoshop Fakes
- The World’s Most Infamous Staged Photos — I agree with every one of the pictures except that of the Loch Ness Monster. EVERYONE knows that is real, duh.
- A Collection of Kisses — see #25: guys, there might still be time, if you are in Paris, that is.

Search for more pictures:

Add a Comment

| More
Fun Stuff
+

Famous “Failures”

Who are the famous people who were… Cut from the high school basketball team, Too stupid to learn anything, Fired for lack of imagination, Defeated in 8 elections, ….

Search for more articles:

Add a Comment

| More
Editorial
+

The Digital Print

Will we one day see the end of all things printed to be replaced by “The Digital Print?

I still get the occasional call offering a limited time free subscription to a newspaper. I feel pretty sad when I turn this offer down because I cannot remember the last time I really read a newspaper, except perhaps the odd time when I am in a waiting office and see one lying around.

Truth be told, I get [almost] all of my news online, mostly on the Internet, a few times on the TV and radio.

The digital revolution is upon us, the door has turned on its hinges and we are entering a new era where the printed material is the exception rather than the norm. Some will argue that we are already there, but it’s not quite true. Just look around you and you will still see billboards, posters, street and traffic signs, house numbers, even mail boxes — all testament that the printed material is still with us in one form or another. Museums and fine art galleries still predominantly display prints.

Continue Reading »

Add a Comment

| More
Articles
+

Should Image Quality be Judged Online or in Print

Interesting article at Luminous Landscape on “The Fallacy of Judging Image Quality Online.” The gist of the article is that too many people are trying to judge the quality of a camera by pixel peeping online versus evaluating the prints it can produce.

Add a Comment